18+Reviewed on 17 October 2026

This page contains affiliate links; they do not change the facts we publish.

Jump to content
Passport OptionalTop casinos

Topic: No KYC

No KYC Casinos in the UK: Twenty Questions, Answered From the Sources

Search for no KYC casinos and the results are confident: anonymous, instant, legal, safe. Ask the regulator, the money-laundering regulations, HMRC and the licence registers the same questions and the answers are shorter and less flattering. This page puts the two side by side, one question at a time.

The format is deliberate. Each section is a question a UK player actually asks, followed by what the primary sources say and, where they say nothing, a plain statement that they say nothing. The casinos in our list are described in the same spirit: the regulator on every card is the one whose register we found the operator in, and the verification wording is the operator's own. Nothing here calls an overseas operator safe or legal for UK players, because no source does.

Tested and written by Megan Lloyd
Senior Writer · Reviewed on 17 October 2026
Edited by Oliver Grant

How we rate the casinos here

  1. Licence and operator behind the site
  2. Payment options in and out
  3. Payout times and limits from the terms
  4. Wagering and bonus rules, not the banner

Megan Lloyd, 17 October 2026

No KYC casinos that accept UK players

Every card answers the first question on this page before any other: who licensed the operator, under what number, and when we last saw that number in the regulator's register. No operator advertising play without verification holds a Gambling Commission licence, because the licence would not permit it; one operator in the wider list does, and its card says so, since it is a licensed casino and not a no KYC one.

The rest hold licences from Curaçao, Anjouan, Tobique, Mohéli or similar, which in the Commission's words do not permit an operator to serve consumers in Great Britain, and the card repeats that. Operators we could find in no register, or whose footer shows a company registration and nothing more, are placed last, labelled.

Each card also quotes the operator's own verification wording and flags any clause excluding the United Kingdom, because those two lines answer most of the questions below for that operator in particular.

Is a no KYC casino legal in the UK?

What the pages say: legal, or a grey area.

What the sources say: an operator needs a Gambling Commission operating licence to provide gambling to people in Great Britain. Doing so without one is an offence under section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005, carrying up to 51 weeks' imprisonment and a fine, and the point-of-consumption provisions apply the section to a remote operator anywhere once it knows, or should know, that people here use its service.

The Commission's guidance states that a licence from another country does not permit an operator to serve consumers in Great Britain. Advertising unlicensed gambling to people here is itself an offence under section 330.

Where the grey comes from: the Act creates no offence for the adult who plays. The Commission's report on illegal online gambling says the illegal activity is the operator's. That is a fact about whom the law targets; it does not make the operator lawful, and it gives the player nothing. There is no grey area about the site. There is simply no protection for the person using it.

Why can no UK-licensed casino offer it?

What the sources say: the licence conditions put verification at the start. Age must be checked before a deposit, before free-to-play games and before gambling; identity, meaning at least name, address and date of birth, must be checked before the customer is allowed to gamble.

The Commission's page for players says a customer cannot place a bet until they have been verified. The same condition protects the player at the other end: a licensee may not delay a withdrawal by asking for documents it could have requested earlier, and the Commission treats such a delay as a possible licence breach.

So the licensed model is check first, pay without surprises. A no KYC model is the mirror image, and only an operator outside the licence can run it.

Is it anonymous?

What the pages say: anonymous, private, no ID.

What the sources say: nothing in any regulator's guidance describes any casino as anonymous. What an operator holds without a document is your email and password, your IP address and device on each visit, every deposit and withdrawal address, any fiat payment details, and your play.

On a public blockchain each address leads to every transaction it has ever made, and HMRC does not regard crypto activity as hidden from it. The Commission lists identity theft among the risks at unlicensed sites, because the operator holding all of that is bound by no UK rule on keeping it.

The honest version: pseudonymous at the cashier, until the operator asks for documents, which it reserves the right to do.

Will I ever be asked for documents?

What the pages say: no verification, ever.

What the sources say: no operator's terms promise that, and the structure of the market says the opposite. The leading UK pages on this subject describe partial KYC, levels of KYC and checks that still kick in.

The usual triggers are the first withdrawal, a threshold the operator sets, or a flag from its monitoring for duplicate accounts, bonus misuse, mismatched payment names or a restricted territory. No operator publishes its threshold in a form we could cite, so none is printed here; a card shows a figure only where the operator's own terms state it.

What the law says about licensees, for comparison: casinos are relevant persons under the money-laundering regulations, which require customer due diligence from £2,000 of deposits, withdrawals or stakes in remote gambling and allow requests for evidence of the source of funds. The Commission's guidance names bank statements as a document an operator may ask for, and income information for affordability. There is no published threshold for source-of-funds requests, and we do not invent one.

What documents will they want?

What the sources say, from the licensed side: identity, meaning a passport or driving licence; address, meaning a recent bill or bank letter; and, where source of funds is in question, bank statements. Overseas operators ask for the same three, in whatever order their terms allow.

The practical answer is to upload them before the first deposit wherever the account allows it. A document request answered at sign-up costs minutes. The same request answered with a balance pending costs the wait, and the wait is set by the operator.

Can I actually withdraw?

What the pages say: instant withdrawals.

What the sources say: every withdrawal passes through the operator's review, and at a no KYC operator that review doubles as the first identity check. The Commission's record of what players at unlicensed sites tell it is that they have been unable to withdraw and have no right of appeal; its blog on illegal gambling lists blocked payouts and unreachable withdrawal limits among what such sites do.

No regulator or payment network publishes a typical casino payout time, so this page does not either; where an operator commits to a window in its terms, the card shows it with the date.

What you can do: read the clause you agreed to; send what it allows the operator to ask for, once, in the format asked; keep dated copies; and ask in writing for the specific outstanding item. Escalation depends on the licence: a Gambling Commission licensee must offer free alternative dispute resolution after eight weeks unresolved; an overseas operator offers whatever its regulator abroad provides, and no UK body has standing.

Will GamStop block it?

What the pages say: not on GamStop.

What the sources say: GamStop's reach ends at the licence boundary, so an operator without a Gambling Commission licence is outside it by definition. Participation is a licence condition for every online licensee; signing up is free; the period is six months, a year or five years and cannot be shortened once chosen; the scheme reports over 614,000 registrations, more than half of them for the full five years.

The Commission's executive director has labelled sites marketed around the phrase illegal online casinos aimed at people who self-excluded, and the Commission's research found that self-excluded players arrive at such sites disproportionately through social media.

The honest version: "not on GamStop" describes the operator's licence, not a service it provides. A reader registered with GamStop should take the numbers from the responsible gambling section and stop there. A reader who wants the scheme's effect extended beyond it can install Gamban or BetBlocker, free to UK residents, which block gambling sites and apps at device level.

Is it safe?

What the pages say: safe, secure, trusted.

What the sources say: the Commission's report on illegal online gambling lists what unlicensed sites typically lack: age verification, responsible gambling tools, secure payment systems and an appropriate dispute resolution scheme. Its blog adds blocked payouts, unreachable limits and identity theft.

The licence conditions that a licensee must meet, verification before play, GamStop, a slot stake cap of £5 a spin or £2 for ages 18 to 24, bonus wagering capped at ten times the bonus, free dispute resolution after eight weeks and a statement on how customer funds are held, do not apply at an overseas operator. "Safe" is a word the sources do not use for any of these sites, and this page does not either.

What reduces the risk, without removing it: a licence found in a register, a verification policy stated in the terms, no UK exclusion clause, verification completed before depositing, only the session's stake in the account, and a deposit cap set. The cards record the first three; the rest are yours.

Is the licence real?

What the pages say: licensed and regulated.

What the sources say: a licence exists when the issuing regulator's own records say it does, and a footer is not a record.

Is a no KYC casino the same as a no account site?

What the pages say: the two labels appear together as if they meant the same.

What the sources say: they describe opposite designs. A no account site, in the few countries where it exists, removes the registration form and uses a login to your own bank, through a payment provider, as the identity check; the bank already knows you, so the casino borrows that knowledge.

The provider that created the model runs it in Sweden, Finland, Estonia and the Netherlands and does not run it in the United Kingdom, where a licensee has to carry out its own verification before play. A no KYC site keeps the form, shrinks it to an email, and checks nothing until it decides to. The first design verifies more than an ordinary casino; the second verifies less and later.

Why is crypto always involved?

What the sources say: a card payment or bank transfer arrives with a name on it; a crypto transfer arrives with an address. The Commission allows its licensees to take crypto on conditions, notification, a reworked money-laundering risk assessment and control of named risks, and one of the named risks is difficulty identifying the customer. That is the regulator explaining why crypto and deferred verification keep company. The FCA's part is narrower than casino pages imply: it supervises exchanges and wallet providers for money laundering through a registration it says must not be presented as approval, and casinos are outside its remit, so "FCA-regulated" on a casino page can only describe a payment partner.

What that means at the cashier: the network printed beside the deposit address must be the network your wallet sends on, or the transfer cannot be recovered; the balance appears once the operator's confirmation count is reached; and every transfer is a permanent public record.

Are the bonuses better?

What the pages say: bigger bonuses, no restrictions.

What the sources say: licence conditions hold a Gambling Commission licensee to wagering of at most ten times the bonus, bar it from bundling casino with other products in one offer, and oblige it to show the significant terms in full within a click. An operator licensed elsewhere writes whatever figures it likes, and the cards quote them with the date.

The usual shape is a larger headline with heavier wagering, and an offer denominated in a volatile asset is worth a different number of pounds each day it takes to clear. Unfinished wagering is also the commonest reason a first cash-out is held, and at a no KYC operator the hold and the first document request tend to arrive in the same message.

The arithmetic: take the bonus, apply the wagering multiple, then scale up by how little your preferred games count. If that turnover is more than you would stake in a normal month, the offer is a cost.

Are the games fair?

What the sources say: studio slots and live tables carry the developer's return-to-player figure and testing, the same as at licensed sites. In-house originals such as crash, dice, plinko and mines can be provably fair: the operator publishes a hash of a server seed before the round, you supply or see a client seed, the result is computed from both plus a round counter, and the server seed is revealed afterwards so you can recompute.

That verifies the round. It does not verify the house edge, the studio games, or whether the operator will pay, which are separate questions with separate answers on this page.

One licence-linked rule reaches the games: Gambling Commission licensees cap online slot stakes at £5 a spin, £2 for players aged 18 to 24; overseas operators apply no cap. Its absence is part of the appeal of these lobbies to high-stake players and part of the harm the Commission describes.

Do I pay tax on winnings?

What the sources say: two HMRC manuals meet here. The business income manual treats betting and gambling as something other than trading, and the capital gains legislation keeps gambling winnings out of chargeable gains, so a win is generally untaxed in the player's hands. The cryptoassets manual says separately that dealing in cryptoassets is not gambling and that each case rests on its facts; a win paid in crypto is still a win, but what you do with the asset afterwards is a disposal that manual governs, so read it before a large conversion. Remote Gaming Duty is an operator's tax on its own profit and never comes off a player's balance.

What happens to my balance if the site disappears?

What the sources say: the Commission is not passive about these operators. Across the nine months from April to December of last year it sent 592 cease-and-desist notices, secured the removal of 203,571 URLs and saw 627 sites shut or geoblocked. A licensee must tell you, before your first deposit, what happens to your money if it becomes insolvent; an overseas operator has no such duty, and a balance held there is an unsecured claim on a company abroad. A site that becomes unreachable from the United Kingdom takes the balance with it, on whatever terms it wrote, with no UK body able to intervene.

What reduces the risk: never leave more than the session's stake in the account, and move the rest to a wallet you control as soon as it exists.

Can I use a VPN if the site blocks the UK?

What the sources say: an operator that excludes the United Kingdom in its terms can refuse a payout on that ground alone. Reaching it through a VPN does not remove the clause; it adds a breach of the terms, and it is not something this page advises. The cards flag every UK exclusion clause we found, and under our rules the clause outweighs any offer on the same site.

What does "levels of KYC" mean?

Level What is collected
None Email and password
Light Details typed in, not checked against documents
Standard Identity and address documents checked
Enhanced Source of funds and affordability evidence

A licensed operator begins at standard, before a bet can be placed, and escalates to enhanced only when the rules demand it. A no KYC operator begins at none or light and escalates in a single jump, usually at the first cash-out, to standard or enhanced. Same four levels; opposite direction of travel, and the direction is the product.

How do you rate the casinos here?

  1. Register entry. Licence number found in the issuing regulator's records, regulator printed on the card; a Gambling Commission licensee is labelled a licensed casino, not a no KYC one.
  2. Verification wording. The terms state when checks occur; plain wording outscores vague wording even where the plain policy is less convenient.
  3. Territory clause. A clause naming the United Kingdom is flagged and outweighs everything else on the site.
  4. Cash-out terms written down: what is reviewed, any ceiling, any promised window.
  5. Bonus terms one click from the offer.
  6. Provably fair tool that runs, where the claim is made.
  7. Limit tools in the account: deposit cap, cooling-off, self-exclusion.

Offer size moves nobody and nobody pays for a place. A licence a register shows as revoked or lapsed drops the operator to the foot of the list with the reason shown.

What rules does this page itself follow?

Pages like this one are advertisements under the gambling marketing rules, which are specific. The CAP Code's section 16 prohibits gambling presented as a remedy for money trouble or as income, prohibits strong appeal to under-18s, and prohibits depicting anyone who appears under 25 gambling. The industry code adds the 18+ mark, a GamCare or GambleAware link and the "#ad" label on affiliate material, with licensed operators answerable for their affiliates' output, and the Advertising Standards Authority has already treated a comparison site as an advertiser in its own right. Hence no "safe" or "legal" beside any overseas operator here, no hint of a route around GamStop, and answers that are shorter than the marketing they correct.

Why do the pages say "instant"?

What the pages say: instant deposits, instant withdrawals.

What the sources say: nothing, because no regulator or payment network publishes a casino payout time. The word describes two different things. A crypto deposit is credited after the operator's confirmation threshold, which depends on the network and the fee you paid; it is often quick and never instant.

A withdrawal is reviewed before anything is broadcast, and at a no KYC operator that review is also the first identity check. "Instant" on a cashier page refers to the on-chain leg after the review, which is the part that was never the problem.

The honest version: deposits are usually fast; withdrawals take as long as the review, and the review is longest at the operators that checked nothing on the way in.

A useful test of any speed claim is to ask for the two numbers separately: the confirmation threshold for deposits, which a transparent operator prints in its cashier, and the review window for withdrawals, which it commits to in its terms or does not.

An operator that quotes the first and not the second has published the half of the timeline that costs it nothing. The cards show both fields and leave either blank where the operator does, and a blank in the second field is the most informative thing on the card.

What is a jurisdiction clause, and why does it matter more than the bonus?

What the sources say: several operators that appear in UK search results for no KYC casinos exclude residents of the United Kingdom in their terms. The clause lets the operator refuse a withdrawal on that ground alone, whatever the cashier accepted on the way in, and it is often invoked at exactly the moment documents are requested, because proof of address is proof of residence. A welcome offer on the same site is worth nothing against it.

How to find it: search the terms for "restricted", "excluded", "prohibited" and "jurisdiction" and read the list. The cards flag every clause we found, and under our rating it outweighs anything else on the page.

How do I check a licence in two minutes?

  1. Find the licence number and the regulator's name in the site's footer. If there is no regulator named, stop: that is the answer.
  2. Open the regulator's own register, not a link on the casino's site: the Gambling Commission's public register, the Curaçao Gaming Authority's certificate page, the Anjouan register or the Tobique validation page.
  3. Search for the number or the company. Confirm that the company named in the register matches the company named in the casino's terms.
  4. Confirm the status is active and, where a date is shown, unexpired.
  5. For the Commission's register, confirm the exact domain you are using is listed and active; a company can hold a licence while a domain has been dropped.

A number that resolves to a different company, a seal that opens an image, or a status that reads revoked each mean the same thing for the rating: no licence. Two minutes is a generous estimate; most lookups take less, and the ones that take longer are usually the ones where the answer is that there is nothing to find.

What is the difference between "not found" and "no licence"?

What the sources say: "not found" is our record that we searched the registers we know and saw nothing. An operator might hold a licence from a regulator whose register we did not consult, or might display its number somewhere we did not look. "No licence" is a stronger claim and we do not make it.

What we do is score the two the same way, because for a UK player the practical difference is nil: a licence we cannot verify gives no more protection than one that does not exist. The card wording keeps the distinction; the position does not.

Can the operator close my account and keep the balance?

What the sources say: most overseas terms reserve the right to close an account at the operator's discretion, and many provide for forfeiture of the balance in cases of duplicate accounts, bonus abuse, territory breaches or failure to provide documents within a set period. None of that is unusual, and none of it is reviewable in the United Kingdom.

A Gambling Commission licensee faces the same situations under different rules: it must have a complaints procedure, must offer free independent dispute resolution after eight weeks, and must have disclosed how customer funds are held. The difference is not that licensed operators never close accounts; it is that a closed account with a balance inside becomes a case rather than a dead end.

What reduces the risk: one account, in your own name, with the details you would put on a passport; verification completed before depositing; nothing idle in the account; the territory clause read before the welcome offer.

Why do operators not publish their verification threshold?

What the sources say: no operator in the market publishes, in a form we could cite, the amount below which withdrawals are paid without documents, and the top-ranking UK pages on the subject do not print one either. The reasons are the operator's own, and the result for the player is that the trigger is unknowable in advance. Where an operator's terms do state a figure, the card reproduces it with the date. Where they do not, the only safe assumption is that the first withdrawal triggers the check.

What would happen at a licensed casino instead?

A short comparison, stage by stage, with the licensed side first.

  1. Sign-up. Licensed: name, address and date of birth collected and checked, age verified, before any deposit or even a demo game. No KYC: email and password.
  2. Deposit. Licensed: by card or bank transfer in pounds, with the operator obliged to disclose how funds are held. No KYC: usually crypto to an address on a named network.
  3. Play. Licensed: slot stakes capped at £5 a spin, £2 for ages 18 to 24; GamStop applies. No KYC: no cap; outside GamStop.
  4. Bonus. Licensed: wagering no more than ten times the bonus, terms within a click. No KYC: operator's own figures.
  5. Withdrawal. Licensed: no new identity documents the operator could have asked for earlier; source-of-funds evidence where the rules require. No KYC: the first identity check, with the balance held.
  6. Dispute. Licensed: complaints procedure, then free ADR after eight weeks. No KYC: the operator's regulator abroad, if any.

The first row is where the licensed side costs you time, and the last two rows are where the no KYC side costs you everything else. Readers who skim this page tend to stop at the first row; readers who have had a withdrawal held tend to start at the last.

Why are there so many of these sites in UK search results?

What the sources say: the Commission's research into illegal online gambling found that search engines are the main route by which players reach unlicensed sites, with social media second and much more significant among people who had self-excluded through GamStop.

The Commission's enforcement figures, hundreds of notices and hundreds of thousands of URLs removed in nine months, describe a market that reappears as fast as it is taken down. Appearing in results is therefore no evidence of anything; the register is the only evidence that counts, and the cards are built from it.

What should I keep as records?

From the first deposit: the operator's register entry as it appeared when you checked it; the terms as they read on the day of each withdrawal request; the transaction ID of every transfer in either direction; a dated screenshot of each deposit and withdrawal screen; every message from support with its date; and, if you bought crypto to deposit, the exchange's purchase confirmation alongside the bank statement that shows the payment to the exchange.

That last pair is what a source-of-funds request is actually asking for. A dispute body at a licensed operator works from such a file; an overseas regulator, where one exists, works from nothing else.

What should I ask support before depositing?

  1. Which regulator issued your licence, and what is the number?
  2. Do your terms exclude residents of the United Kingdom?
  3. Can I complete verification now, before any deposit, and which documents do you need?
  4. Is there a withdrawal amount below which no documents are requested, and where in your terms is it?
  5. What do you review before releasing a withdrawal, and how long do your terms allow?
  6. Where in the account do I set a deposit cap?

Ask in live chat, before registering if the operator allows it, and keep the transcript with the date visible. The first two answers decide whether to continue; a vague answer to the third tells you when the check will come. A dated transcript is also the only promise an overseas operator makes that you can later set against its terms, which is worth more than it sounds when a withdrawal has been pending for a fortnight and the terms have quietly changed in the meantime.

Glossary of terms used in these answers

Is "light KYC" better than "no KYC"?

What the pages say: light KYC as a middle ground.

What the sources say: the phrase usually means that the operator collects a name, date of birth and address at sign-up and does not check them against documents. For the player it changes little at the front, since typing details is not verification, and it changes something at the back: an operator that holds typed details can compare them with the documents it later requests, and a mismatch between what was typed in a hurry and what a passport says is a common reason a withdrawal is held.

If the operator asks for details at sign-up, give the ones that match your documents exactly. If it offers a verification section, use it before depositing. "Light" is not a protection; it is a record the operator will hold you to.

What does the regulator abroad actually do for me?

What the sources say: what we can verify about an overseas regulator is what its register shows: a licence number, a holding company, a status and sometimes an expiry date. That is enough to establish that a licence exists. It is not evidence about how complaints are handled, whether the regulator will intervene in a withheld withdrawal, or what happens to customer funds if the operator fails, and we have no primary source on those questions for any of the regulators in the table above.

The cards therefore say "licensed by" and nothing more. The Gambling Commission, by contrast, publishes its licence conditions, its complaints route and its enforcement record, which is why a Gambling Commission licence is treated differently throughout this page and why the one licensee in the wider list is labelled as what it is.

The honest version: an overseas licence tells you the operator exists and someone issued it a number. Whether that someone will answer your email is a question the sources do not answer, so neither do we.

Who is this for, and who is it not for?

For: a player who already holds crypto, has understood that the operator answers to no UK rule and owes them nothing in law, keeps nothing in the account beyond the session's stake, uploads documents before depositing wherever the account allows it, and has searched the terms for the United Kingdom.

Not for: anyone on GamStop; anyone who could not bear to lose the balance with no appeal; anyone who wants a stake cap, a wagering ceiling or a dispute route, since those come only with a licence this market does not hold; anyone who thinks the method is anonymous; and anyone under 18, for whom gambling is an offence in itself.

Pros and cons, in one table

The pages' version The sources' version
Anonymous Pseudonymous until documents are requested
Instant withdrawals Review first, with the first identity check inside it
No verification Verification deferred to the moment money leaves
Licensed and regulated Licensed elsewhere; no UK rights, no UK protections
Not on GamStop Outside the scheme because outside the licence

Responsible gambling

Postponed verification strips out the pauses a licensed operator is required to build in, so build your own: a deposit cap entered before the first transfer, a cooling-off period when a session starts to run, and GamStop for anyone who wants every licensed site shut at once. Gambling in Great Britain is for adults of 18 and over.

GamCare answers the National Gambling Helpline at any hour, free and in confidence, on 0808 8020 133. GambleAware's site lists support near you. Gamban and BetBlocker shut gambling sites and apps on a device at no charge. StepChange (0800 138 1111) and National Debtline (0808 808 4000) give free debt advice. BeGambleAware

Frequently asked questions

What is the shortest honest definition of a no KYC casino?

An operator, licensed outside Great Britain, that registers you with an email and postpones identity checks until money leaves the account. No Gambling Commission licensee can run that model, because the licence requires verification before you gamble.

If no KYC casinos are not licensed here, why do they appear in UK search results?

Because search engines index them and the Commission's own research found search to be the main route players take to unlicensed sites. Appearing in results is not evidence of a licence; the register is.

Can a no KYC casino refuse to pay me?

Its terms almost always allow it to hold or refuse a withdrawal pending documents, on a territory breach, or at its discretion. There is no UK body to appeal to. The Commission records withheld payouts as a common outcome at unlicensed sites.

Does paying in crypto make me anonymous to the casino?

No. The operator holds your email, device, IP address and every payment address, and the blockchain is a public ledger of every transfer. What it lacks is a scan of your passport until it asks for one.

What is the £2,000 figure I keep seeing?

The threshold in the UK money-laundering regulations at which a casino must carry out customer due diligence on remote deposits, withdrawals or stakes. It binds licensees. Overseas operators have their own regulators' thresholds, which they rarely publish.

Are winnings from a no KYC casino taxable?

For the player, HMRC treats gambling as outside trading, so the win itself is generally untaxed. If it was paid in crypto, the later sale falls under HMRC's cryptoassets manual as a disposal; read that before converting a large amount.

Is there any way to use a no KYC casino safely?

Safely is the wrong word, because the UK protections do not apply. Less riskily: check the licence in a register, read the terms for a UK exclusion, complete verification before depositing, keep only the session's stake in the account, and set a deposit cap.

Why does a licensed casino ask for ID before I can even play a demo?

Because the licence condition requires age verification before free-to-play games as well as before deposits. It is one of the clearest differences between a licensed lobby and a no KYC one.

What should I do if a no KYC casino has held my withdrawal for weeks?

Send exactly the documents its terms allow it to request, once, and ask in writing for the specific outstanding item. If it is a Gambling Commission licensee, which it will not be, you could escalate after eight weeks; otherwise the only route is its own regulator abroad.

Sources